Video
Join a live product demo of the Inhubber platform with CEO Dr. Elena Mechik
burger close

AI. Automated workflows. E-signatures. Centralized repositories. Today’s contract management conversation is dominated by technology. But behind every feature that helps companies analyze thousands of documents, track obligations, and flag risk, there’s a more fundamental set of questions:

How do you make a complex system transparent?

How do you build trust between parties who may sit in different companies, countries, and legal systems?

How do you pin down who’s accountable for what?

How do you prove that critical information hasn’t been quietly altered?

And how do you turn scattered data into a foundation for better decisions?

For Inhubber, these questions predate the platform itself. They trace back to the doctoral research of co-founder and CEO Dr. Elena Mechik — work in sustainable development, natural resource economics, and the management of complex socio-economic systems.

It’s a research path that started with tropical forests and local economies, and wound its way through supply chain transparency, blockchain, digital contract management, and, eventually, AI-powered contract intelligence. It’s proof that a scientific question doesn’t have to end at a journal — it can end up as working software.

From sustainability economics to complex systems research

Before Inhubber, Elena Mechik was a researcher at the University of Hamburg’s Research Unit Sustainability and Global Change.

In 2017, she completed her PhD, “Managing the driver of climate change in the context of sustainable tropical forest management through regulation of economic activities in forest communities while analyzing social-economic interactions.” The dissertation is listed among the group’s doctoral work.

Tropical forests and contract management sound like they have nothing in common. They don’t — not on the surface.

But the real question behind the research was much bigger than forestry.

You can’t separate an ecological system from the economic behavior of the people inside it. Banning things doesn’t protect natural resources — understanding why people make the economic choices they make does. What incentives are they responding to? What resources do they actually have? Who’s accountable when things go wrong?

That systems-level thinking — economic, social, and environmental factors, all interacting — turned out to map directly onto a completely different problem: contract management.

A contract doesn’t exist in a vacuum either. It ties together people, organizations, obligations, money, deadlines, approval chains, and legal requirements. If one part of that system is opaque, the fallout can hit the entire organization.

What makes economic activity sustainable

One of the key papers — Mechik and von Hauff’s “Requirements for the Sustainable Development of Economic Activities in Tropical Forest Communities” (European Journal of Sustainable Development, 2016) — looked at what local communities actually need to run an economy and preserve the forest around them.

The answer came down to a handful of fundamentals: clear legal rights to manage resources, targeted investment and startup capital, and organizational, technical, and methodological support.

The insight underneath all of that: sustainability isn’t something you get by telling people what not to do. It requires structure.

Rights need to be clear.

Responsibilities need to be defined.

Oversight mechanisms need to exist.

People need access to the right information.

And incentives need to line up with the system’s long-term goals.

Sound familiar? It should — it’s the exact logic behind modern corporate governance.

A company might have hundreds or thousands of contracts. Having signed documents on file doesn’t mean the organization is actually managing them. You still need to know:

Structure is what turns a pile of documents into a managed system.

From theory to the field

The next step was testing the model in practice. In “Analysis of the changes in economic activities of Brazilian forest communities after methodical support and provision of pre-financing capital” (Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 2017), Mechik, von Hauff, de Moura, and Held tracked how economic activity in Brazilian communities shifted after they received organizational, methodological, and financial support — including work with non-timber forest products, aimed at making forest preservation part of a viable long-term economic strategy.

Earlier, at Tropentag 2014, Mechik had presented the concept of Small Scale Forest Enterprises with Social Responsibility — small businesses designed to create jobs, generate income, monitor forest resources, and use the ecosystem without destroying it, based on observations across communities in Brazil, India, and Thailand.

Which raises the next question: even with the right rules in place, how do you know they’re being followed?

That’s the point where a sustainability problem quietly becomes a transparency problem.

Transparency as the foundation for managing complex systems

The more parties involved in an economic system, the harder it gets to control how information moves.

Take an international supply chain: raw material producers, suppliers, logistics providers, intermediaries, financial institutions, buyers, regulators. Every party generates its own paperwork — contracts, addenda, certificates, invoices, delivery confirmations, amendments. When none of that data reliably lines up across parties, you get a gap — and gaps invite errors, manipulation, and non-compliance.

The same problem shows up inside a single company. Legal has one version of the contract. Procurement has another. Someone’s tracking deadlines in a spreadsheet. Finance finds out about payments over email. Changes get discussed in Slack, and the signed document ends up in yet another system.

Technically, the information exists. Practically, nobody has the full picture.

That’s why “single source of truth” is a core principle in modern contract management. In Inhubber, contracts and related data live in one centralized place, with access governed by roles and permissions.

Centralized storage only solves part of the problem, though. The next question: can you actually trust the change history?

From transparency to blockchain

Research into sustainable supply chains eventually led Mechik to blockchain — a technology built specifically to create a verifiable record of actions.

In 2021, “The Fight Against Deforestation of Tropical Forests — The Contribution of the Blockchain-Based Contract Management Method to Minimize Illegal Logging” was published in Climate and Development, examining how blockchain-based contract management could improve transparency in timber supply chains and help curb illegal logging. (Inhubber covers this shift from forestry research to blockchain and digital contract management in more depth in a separate piece on Elena Mechik.)

The real value of blockchain here isn’t the buzzword — it’s the ability to prove a sequence of events actually happened. Who took the action? When? Does the current version of the document match what was originally recorded? Did anything change after a specific event?

In contract management, those questions matter enormously. If a contract moves through multiple departments for approval, the organization needs to be able to reconstruct the entire process: who reviewed it, when it was approved, what changed, who triggered the signature, which version is final.

That’s why traceability is baked into Inhubber’s architecture. The platform uses audit trails and blockchain-based verification to confirm the integrity and history of contract processes — without putting the actual contract content on-chain. Instead, cryptographic verification confirms data integrity without ever publishing the document itself.

That distinction matters. The goal isn’t to make a confidential contract public — it’s to create an extra layer of proof that the data hasn’t been quietly swapped out.

How the science became Inhubber

The link between the early research and the platform is clearest when you look past the specific technologies and focus on the underlying principles.

Transparency → Centralized contract management. You can’t make good decisions in a complex system when information is scattered across a dozen sources. So step one is centralization. Inhubber lets you store contracts in a single digital repository, organize them by folder or company structure, run full-text search, and work from one place instead of ten.

Traceability → Audit trail. Knowing a contract’s current state isn’t enough — you need to know how it got there. Audit trails preserve the history of actions, approvals, and edits, which matters for internal review, compliance, and audits.

Accountability → Roles and access permissions. In a well-functioning system, accountability can’t be vague. It has to be clear who can see what, who can edit it, who reviews it, and who’s on the hook for a given action. Inhubber lets you assign roles, set access permissions, and tie workflows to specific people.

Obligation control → Contract obligation tracking. Signing a contract is the start of the obligations, not the end of the process. Inhubber’s AI extracts deadlines, milestones, payment obligations, and recurring commitments from contracts and turns them into structured tasks and reminders.

Process control → Automated workflows. The same approval process gets repeated hundreds of times. Handled manually, that means chasing emails, figuring out who needs to sign off, nudging people about overdue steps, and tracking status by hand. Inhubber automates approvals, tasks, statuses, reminders, and escalations.

The technology, in other words, is a practical answer to questions that started out purely academic: transparency, accountability, structure, control.

Why just storing contracts isn’t enough

For years, “digitizing contracts” meant one thing: scan the paper, drop it in a folder. Better than a filing cabinet, sure. But the core problem never went away.

A PDF doesn’t manage obligations. It doesn’t flag an upcoming termination deadline. It doesn’t kick off an approval. It doesn’t warn you when a commitment’s been missed. It doesn’t give leadership a picture of contract risk across the business.

That’s why contract management has been moving from document storage toward full Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) — treating a contract not as a static file, but as a process: drafting, negotiation, review, approval, signature, execution, performance monitoring, and eventually renewal or termination.

Inhubber brings all of these stages into one platform.

Scientifically, this is a real shift in what’s being managed. The object isn’t the document anymore. It’s the system of relationships and actions built around it.

AI: from storing information to understanding it

Once information is centralized and traceable, the next question is scale: how do you actually process the volume?

A company might have 100 contracts. It might have 100,000. Manually reading every document for deadlines, obligations, liability clauses, renewal terms, payment conditions, and risk becomes practically impossible past a certain point.

That’s where AI comes in. Inhubber’s AI analyzes documents and converts unstructured contract text into structured data — surfacing key dates, terms, obligations, and potential risks, and feeding that data into the rest of the platform’s workflows.

That’s the real difference between file storage and contract intelligence. Take a 70-page contract. For a human, that’s a lot of reading. For a contract-intelligence system, it’s a set of connected data points: start date, end date, notice period, renewal clause, payment obligations, responsible parties, risk provisions, liability terms, delivery obligations, related documents, and future actions that need to happen.

Once that’s structured, the contract stops being a document and starts being a data source.

From contract intelligence to action

Even a great AI analysis is only worth so much if it just produces a nice-looking summary. The real automation kicks in when that information triggers something.

AI finds a renewal date → create a reminder. Finds an obligation → assign an owner. Flags a risk → kick off a review. A deadline is approaching → send a notification. An approval is stuck → trigger an escalation.

That’s how analysis becomes part of the actual workflow — not just a report. Inhubber uses the dates and obligations extracted from contracts to generate reminders, tasks, and workflows.

Which brings this full circle to the original research logic: information isn’t valuable on its own. It becomes valuable when it changes how the system behaves.

Four principles of modern contract management

Boil the whole path — from PhD research to CLM platform — down, and you get four core principles.

1. Transparency. Everyone should be working from the same up-to-date information — one shared space for contracts and related data, instead of spreadsheets, email threads, and local folders.

2. Traceability. Every important action should be recoverable. The organization needs to know who changed, approved, or signed a document, and when — critical for regulated industries, internal audits, and multi-step approvals.

3. Accountability. An obligation without an owner is an obligation that gets forgotten. A real contract management system ties commitments to specific owners, roles, tasks, and deadlines.

4. Data-driven decisions. Contracts are packed with business-critical information — pricing, obligations, risk, deadlines, payment terms, renewals, liability limits. As long as that information is locked inside a PDF, it’s basically unusable at scale. AI contract analysis turns part of that into structured, searchable, automatable data.

Together, these four principles are what turn contract management from an administrative chore into a real lever of corporate governance.

Don’t let a contract become a dead PDF

One of the most common failures in contract management happens right after signature.

Before signing, a contract gets all the attention — discussed, edited, reviewed, negotiated. Then it’s signed, and it goes into the archive.

But that’s exactly when the contract’s real economic life begins. Obligations need to be met. Payments need to go out. Deadlines need tracking. Deliveries need monitoring. SLAs need checking. Renewal dates need watching. Renegotiation or termination needs to be triggered on time.

Which means a real contract management platform has to keep working with the contract after signature. Inhubber connects contract data to reminders, tasks, obligations, and workflows, and tracks the contract across its full lifecycle — right through renewal or termination.

This is where contract lifecycle management really earns its name. A contract stops being something you file away and becomes an active part of the business process.

The science shows up in modern supply chains, too

The connection between Mechik’s early research and today’s contract management is especially clear in supply chains.

A global supply chain is a web of organizations and contractual relationships. Contracts are how companies lock in supplier requirements, delivery terms, liability, quality standards, compliance obligations, and sustainability requirements. Supply chain transparency, in other words, rides almost entirely on how well the underlying contract data is managed.

In 2025, Inhubber revisited this theme directly in a piece on AI-powered supply chain contract management — connecting the earlier blockchain and AI research to today’s transparency, sustainability, and compliance requirements.

As supply chains and corporate accountability requirements get more complex, being able to quickly find the right contract, pin down obligations, and prove what actually happened matters more than ever.

Security is what makes transparency possible

Transparency and security can look like they’re pulling in opposite directions. Does “transparent” mean “accessible to everyone”?

No. Real transparency means the right person has access to the right information — and every action inside the system stays traceable.

That matters a lot for contracts, which routinely contain pricing, personal data, trade secrets, banking details, and strategic terms. So contract management has to deliver, simultaneously: centralization, access control, encryption, auditability, and data integrity protection.

Inhubber uses role-based access control, encryption, audit trails, and hosts infrastructure in Germany, with ISO/IEC 27001 certification and GDPR compliance. The goal isn’t to spread information as widely as possible — it’s managed transparency.

Scientific impact is bigger than publications

Academic impact is usually measured in papers, conferences, and citations. But there’s another kind of impact: research that becomes a methodology, that becomes a process, that becomes a technology, that becomes something real organizations actually use.

That’s the path Inhubber took. Mechik’s research started with a question about organizing economic activity in a complex system without letting individual interests wreck the system’s long-term sustainability. That led to a question about transparency — how do you verify where information came from, trace actions, build trust between parties? Blockchain offered a technical answer. Contract management applied those principles to corporate processes. AI took the next step, turning large volumes of unstructured information into data that can actually drive automation and decisions.

The path, roughly: sustainable development → structuring complex systems → transparency → traceability → blockchain → digital contract management → AI → contract intelligence.

The science is still running inside the product

Inhubber’s scientific roots aren’t just a founding story — the original questions are still live today.

How do you reduce information asymmetry? Build in accountability? Make processes verifiable? Cut dependence on manual oversight? Use large volumes of data to make better decisions?

The answers have shifted with the technology — first economic models and organizational processes, then blockchain, now increasingly AI. But the underlying problem hasn’t changed: take a complex system with lots of participants and lots of information, and make it transparent, understandable, and manageable.

That’s why Inhubber’s scientific story isn’t really a “science pivots to business” story. The research mindset didn’t stop when the company was founded — it’s baked into the product logic itself. AI analyzes information. Workflows structure processes. Roles define accountability. Audit trails deliver traceability. Obligation tracking ties contract terms to real actions. Reminders turn dates buried in a document into events that can’t slip through the cracks.

Together, these are solving the same class of problem that sat at the center of the original research: how do you keep information, accountability, and action connected inside a complex system?

From research to real-world impact

Today, Inhubber brings together centralized contract management, AI-powered contract analysis, workflows, e-signatures, obligation tracking, reminders, and reporting in one platform.

It’s one of the more interesting versions of scientific impact you’ll find: research that doesn’t end at publication, but becomes a new question, then a new method, then a new technology — and finally, a product that solves a real, everyday problem instead of a theoretical one.

For Inhubber, that path started with sustainable development and complex economic systems in tropical forests. Today, it continues in AI-powered contract management.

The context changed. The core idea didn’t: you can only manage complex systems well when information is transparent, actions are traceable, accountability is clear, and data actually drives decisions.

Around
0%
better deadline control
Centralized deadline tracking helps 17er Oberlandenergie identify long-term notice periods and upcoming actions earlier and manage them more reliably.
Around
0%
less time spent searching
Central storage, search, and custom labels make it much easier to find relevant contracts compared with decentralized folder structures.

Contract management for energy providers goes far beyond simply storing documents digitally. Energy procurement, energy services, investments, PV parks, maintenance and lease agreements, as well as numerous internal contracts all come with different terms, notice periods, pricing arrangements, obligations, and responsibilities.

For municipal utilities and publicly owned energy providers, there is another layer of complexity: contracts must not only be easy to find. Responsibilities need to be clearly assigned, important deadlines must be identified early, and contract information has to be available in a reliable and structured way for audits and reviews.

That is why 17er Oberlandenergie decided to centralize its contract management with Inhubber. In a conversation with Dr. Elena Mechik, CEO of Inhubber, Managing Director Ralph Müller shares the company’s starting point, the specific requirements of a municipal energy provider, and the tangible benefits of centralized contract management, automated deadline tracking, AI contract analysis, and structured contract search.

About 17er Oberlandenergie

17er Oberlandenergie GmbH, based in Murnau am Staffelsee, is a municipally owned energy provider. According to Managing Director Ralph Müller, the company supplies around 20,000 electricity and gas customers with green electricity and green gas.

For this customer story, Dr. Elena Mechik, CEO of Inhubber, spoke with Ralph Müller, Managing Director of 17er Oberlandenergie, about the digitalization of contract management and the company’s experience with Inhubber.

Which contracts does an energy provider need to manage centrally?

Ralph Müller: “For an energy provider, it’s not just about electricity and gas supply contracts with end customers. For our company-wide contract management, the relevant areas are mainly energy procurement, energy services, framework agreements, employment contracts, investments, leases, and other operational agreements.

With Inhubber, we first centralized exactly these company-wide contracts.

Our approximately 20,000 electricity and gas contracts with end customers, on the other hand, remain in our ERP system. That is a standardized mass-market business and is currently better managed there.

The key point is that Inhubber does not necessarily replace existing systems. We use it wherever individual deadlines, responsibilities, and obligations need to be actively managed.”

The challenge: contracts were scattered across the company

Before Inhubber, contracts at 17er Oberlandenergie were managed in a decentralized way by the employees responsible for them. As a result, there was no complete overview of existing contracts, deadlines, or responsibilities.

How were contracts managed before Inhubber?

Ralph Müller: “Our contracts were stored very decentrally with the employees responsible for them.

That caused problems particularly when it came to deadlines and responsibilities. Deadlines were not monitored consistently, tasks were not always clearly assigned, and when employees changed roles or left the company, it was not always clear where a contract was stored or whether action was still required.

We therefore wanted to move away from individual filing structures and toward one central system.”

The requirements: simple, flexible, and without additional bureaucracy

For 17er Oberlandenergie, the goal was not to find the system with the largest possible number of features. The new solution needed to cover the essential processes reliably while remaining simple enough to be used in everyday work.

What was particularly important to you when choosing contract management software?

Ralph Müller: “Three factors were especially important to us: reliable deadline tracking, clear task allocation, and intuitive usability.

At the same time, we wanted to be able to adapt the system flexibly to our own structures.

Our goal was not to create additional bureaucracy. We wanted a simple, well-designed system that focuses on the things that really matter.”

Why 17er Oberlandenergie chose Inhubber

Which Inhubber features were decisive for you?

Ralph Müller: “What impressed us most was how easy the system is to use. After a short introduction, you can get up to speed very quickly.

At the same time, we can adapt structures flexibly and change them later if our organization changes.

Permissions are easy to manage. And deadline and task management in particular are very clear and intuitive for users.

That was crucial for us: the system not only has to be powerful, it also has to be something employees actually use.”

The result: a central overview of contracts for the first time

With the introduction of Inhubber, 17er Oberlandenergie gained visibility into how many different contracts actually existed across the company — and who was responsible for them.

Which departments currently use Inhubber?

Ralph Müller: “At the moment, procurement and contract management are the main teams using Inhubber for our cross-departmental contracts. We are gradually bringing additional areas into the system.

One major effect was that we suddenly discovered contracts that had never been visible centrally before.

For the first time, we now have one place where we can see which contracts actually exist.

Collaboration has also improved because it is much clearer who is responsible for each contract.

That has already helped us avoid a few unpleasant surprises.”

Deadline management: when contracts directly affect operations

For energy providers, contract deadlines are not just an administrative matter. Service, maintenance, and lease agreements can directly affect the profitability of PV projects, for example. Other contracts may even be relevant to security of supply.

How important are contract deadlines and terms for 17er Oberlandenergie?

Ralph Müller: “Deadlines, contract terms, pricing arrangements, and maintenance agreements are particularly important to us.

Among other things, we operate PV parks. There, service, maintenance, and lease agreements have a direct impact on the profitability of an investment project.

That means we need to identify early when action is required.

In the regulated energy sector, we also need to keep critical contracts under control at all times. If one of these expires or is terminated without us noticing, in the worst case it could affect the supply of our customers.

That is exactly why we need structured contract management.”

AI contract analysis: identifying relevant information faster

Energy contracts can be extensive and often contain numerous clauses, deadlines, and obligations. It is not always obvious at first glance which document is relevant or which sections require closer attention.

How does Inhubber’s AI support you with complex contracts?

Ralph Müller: “The AI helps us review some very extensive contracts quickly and get straight to the important points.

I find the overview function particularly useful. I can very quickly see: Is this actually the contract I’m looking for? And where are the points I should take a closer look at?

That is especially helpful for contract negotiations, renewals, or deadlines.

Instead of having to read every large document from beginning to end, you can get to the relevant sections much faster.”

Contract workflows: transparency first, automation second

17er Oberlandenergie is deliberately taking a step-by-step approach to digitalization. The first priority is to centralize contracts and clarify responsibilities. Further processes and contract workflows can then be built on this foundation.

Which workflows have you already automated?

Ralph Müller: “When it comes to workflows, we are still relatively early in the process.

The first step is to bring together all relevant contracts and clarify who is responsible for each one.

After that, we want to define clear guidelines for how contracts should be managed across the company in the future. Based on that, we can build additional processes and workflows.

So at the moment, we are not yet using the full potential of Inhubber in this area.”

Finding contracts faster instead of searching through shared drives

Historically grown folder structures often make finding contracts unnecessarily complicated. Inhubber allows 17er Oberlandenergie to search for contracts using keywords and individually defined labels.

How do you find contracts faster today?

Ralph Müller: “Search works very well using keywords. We also make a lot of use of our own labels.

That allows us to find relevant contracts much faster than we could in our old shared-drive structures.

With old folder systems, at some point nobody knows why a document was stored in a particular place. Search and labels make access much easier.”

Audits: reliable contract data available at any time

Municipal companies regularly need to provide contract information for internal and external audits. With decentralized storage, it can be difficult to know whether a contract overview is actually complete.

What role does centralized contract management play in audits?

Ralph Müller: “Because of our municipal structure, we are subject to various audits, some of which go into considerable detail.

Providing an overview of relevant contracts is a recurring requirement.

With Inhubber, it is much easier for us today to create an up-to-date and reliable overview. We no longer have to hope that we have actually found every relevant contract.

Instead, we have one central software solution from which we can retrieve the information in a structured way.”

The tangible benefit: better control over long-term deadlines

Long notice and amendment periods can easily be overlooked in day-to-day business. With lead times of six months or more, waiting until shortly before the end of a contract is simply too late.

What improvements have you seen since introducing Inhubber?

Ralph Müller: “Above all, we have much better control over deadlines today.

That is particularly helpful for long-term deadlines of, for example, six months, where changes need to be prepared well in advance.

The second major benefit is transparency: contracts are stored centrally, managed according to a consistent structure, and are easy to search.

Overall, this has given us much greater transparency across our contract management.”

Implementation: one workshop to get started

Contract management software adds little value if implementation requires months of training and significant internal resources.

How did the implementation of Inhubber go?

Ralph Müller: “For us, one in-house workshop was enough to get started.

After that, employees were already able to work with the basic functions and take their first steps in Inhubber.

Because the system is intuitive, adoption has been good. At the same time, we can gradually expand our knowledge and continue developing the system independently.”

Inhubber for municipal utilities and energy providers

Would you recommend Inhubber to other energy providers?

Ralph Müller: “I would definitely recommend Inhubber to other municipal utilities.

The problem of decentralized contract management certainly doesn’t only exist in our company. At the same time, I’ve seen organizations that technically have a document management system but don’t use it consistently because it is simply too complex.

In those cases, the system exists, but in practice it becomes little more than a digital filing graveyard.

Inhubber provides a very accessible way to introduce structured contract management. From my perspective, that is a major advantage.”

Conclusion: contract management has to work in everyday operations

The experience of 17er Oberlandenergie shows why contract management for energy providers goes far beyond maintaining a digital contract archive.

The first step is to create a complete overview of existing contracts and clearly assign responsibilities. From there, deadlines, tasks, and additional processes can be managed systematically.

With Inhubber, 17er Oberlandenergie has created a central foundation for this:

  • Contracts are managed according to one consistent system.
  • Responsibilities are more transparent.
  • Long-term deadlines become visible early.
  • Contracts can be found faster using search and labels.
  • AI helps review extensive documents for relevant information more efficiently.
  • Information required for audits is available centrally and in a structured format.

Not every contract process needs to be automated immediately. 17er Oberlandenergie demonstrates a pragmatic approach: first centralize the contract portfolio, then structure responsibilities, and finally build additional workflows and automation on top.

This turns digital contract management into an operational foundation for greater transparency, better deadline control, and lower risk in the day-to-day business of an energy provider.

0%
missed termination deadlines
Since introducing Inhubber, CECEBA has not missed a relevant termination deadline. Automated notifications ensure that responsible teams can act in time.
0%
digital signing process
CECEBA now handles the signing process for its international commercial agent agreements digitally through Inhubber — from sending the contract to receiving the legally valid signature.

Contract management in retail quickly becomes more complex as a company grows. Purchasing and supplier agreements, leases, employment contracts, sales agreements, and contracts with international partners all need to be centrally accessible, deadlines must be monitored reliably, and responsibilities clearly assigned.

Last year, our customer story with rebuy showed how digital contract management can simplify these processes in retail. Now, CECEBA, another established retail and manufacturing company, shares how it uses Inhubber to centrally manage contracts, automate contract workflows, and securely control access to sensitive contract information.

About CECEBA

CECEBA is a medium-sized family-owned company with around 130 years of history and is now run by the fifth generation. The group operates in areas including men’s daywear and nightwear, swimwear, women’s nightwear, and workwear, combining manufacturing with a broad B2B and B2C sales network.

For this customer story, Dr. Elena Mechik, CEO of Inhubber, spoke with Nick Schäfer, Managing Director and Shareholder of the CECEBA Group. Nick Schäfer is particularly responsible for the company’s external operations, including sales and production, and introduced Inhubber around two and a half years ago as one of his first digitalization projects at the company.

The challenge: historically grown, decentralized contract management

How were contracts managed at CECEBA before Inhubber?

Nick Schäfer: “We’re a family-owned company with around 130 years of history. Naturally, structures have developed over many decades — and when it came to contracts, things were particularly decentralized.

Contracts were stored in different folders and departments. In some cases, only individual teams had access to them, while responsibilities were not always clearly defined.

Deadlines were also tracked manually in Excel spreadsheets. One of the specific triggers for the project was actually a missed termination deadline.

That was the point when I said: something this important simply can’t be managed without a proper central tool. That’s when we started looking for contract management software.”

The requirements: central storage, deadlines, access rights, and ease of use

What was particularly important to you when choosing contract management software?

Nick Schäfer: “A central repository was one of the first priorities. On top of that, we needed reliable deadline management and clearly defined access rights.

Especially with sensitive HR contracts, it has to be absolutely clear who is allowed to see them. At the same time, someone working in sales doesn’t automatically need access to production contracts.

So for us, it was really about clear responsibilities and a clear structure.

Another very important factor was usability. A tool costs money, so it needs to create a real improvement and, most importantly, people actually need to use it. If it’s too complicated, employees simply won’t work with it.

Those were the main criteria for us when making the decision.”

Why did you choose Inhubber?

Nick Schäfer: “Inhubber is very easy to use while still being flexible enough to adapt to our individual requirements.

It was important for us to be able to change structures quickly and adjust the system whenever our processes changed.

And then there were the core requirements we had already identified: deadline management, access rights, central storage, and straightforward usability.

Because our contract portfolio is so diverse, we need a tool that allows us to structure very different types of contracts in a clear and consistent way.”

Contract management in retail: from production and sales to HR

What types of contracts does CECEBA manage with Inhubber?

Nick Schäfer: “Our contract portfolio is very diverse.

We have contracts related to production and purchasing, as well as HR and employment agreements.

On the sales side, we manage various customer contracts, including agreements for shop-in-shop concepts and consignment models.

We also have leases and commercial agent agreements, both in Germany and internationally.

So our contract portfolio is relatively complex. That’s exactly why having one central structure is so important for us.”

Clear responsibilities across different departments

Which departments currently work with Inhubber?

Nick Schäfer: “Inhubber is used across many different areas of the company.

Purchasing, for example, is responsible for contracts related to production and logistics. Our internal sales team manages customer contracts, HR handles employment agreements, and accounting is responsible for areas such as leases.

Marketing also works with Inhubber, for example for sponsorship agreements.

We’ve defined clear contacts and responsibilities within each department. That means every team knows exactly which contracts it is responsible for.”

AI contract analysis and OCR: digitizing and finding contracts faster

How does Inhubber support digitization, AI analysis, and contract search?

Nick Schäfer: “In a company with more than 130 years of history, you naturally accumulate a lot of contracts. Some of them were still available only on paper.

So the initial process of digitizing and uploading everything does require some effort.

Inhubber helps by automatically extracting information and pre-filling fields. That makes the process significantly faster.

Another major advantage is search. I don’t always need to know the exact name of a document. I can simply search for a term and find the relevant contract.

That saves time and makes everyday work much easier.”

Contract management workflows: digital signatures and automated deadline tracking

Which contract processes have you digitized or automated with Inhubber?

Nick Schäfer: “A good example is our international commercial agent agreements.

It’s not always easy to physically send a contract from one country to another. But of course, we still need a legally valid signature.

We now handle this entire process through Inhubber. The contractual partner receives an email, opens the process, verifies their identity, and can sign the contract digitally.

We’re then notified once the contract has been signed. In the case of a commercial agent, for example, we know that everything is legally in place and we can send out the collection.

The whole process has become faster, more efficient, and much more structured.”

Automatic reminders instead of manually maintained deadlines

How does deadline monitoring work today?

Nick Schäfer: “Deadline monitoring is much more structured today.

We receive automatic notifications whenever an important contract deadline is approaching. That means nothing gets overlooked, and responsibilities are clearly defined.

I don’t have to constantly log into the system or open individual contracts just to check whether something needs attention.

Inhubber proactively lets us know. That makes the work much easier.”

Access rights for GDPR-compliant contract management

How does CECEBA manage access rights and permissions?

Nick Schäfer: “We work very strongly with department-based structures.

Purchasing, for example, has its own area, and other departments work within their respective structures as well.

For sensitive contracts, it’s important for us to clearly define who is allowed to access them. Someone in sales doesn’t need to see HR or production contracts if they’re not relevant to their work.

This gives us clear responsibilities while also making sure employees aren’t confronted with contracts that have nothing to do with their area.”

The tangible benefit: no more missed termination deadlines

What improvements have you seen since introducing Inhubber?

Nick Schäfer: “Since then, we haven’t had another situation where a termination deadline was missed.

Inhubber proactively alerts us whenever an important deadline is coming up.

At the same time, deadline monitoring and responsibilities are clearly structured. Nothing falls through the cracks anymore.

Another major benefit is search. The amount of time we spend looking for information has dropped significantly. Even during a conversation, I can quickly pull up a contract or check a specific piece of information.

That makes us faster and reduces administrative work.

I can’t honestly put the impact into a precise number or say that it saves half an FTE, for example. But the improvement is very noticeable in our day-to-day work.”

Implementing contract management software: step by step instead of a big bang

How did the implementation of Inhubber go?

Nick Schäfer: “Whenever we introduce a new tool, we have one person who takes the lead on the project. That person then also trains the other employees.

Inhubber’s interface is very straightforward. It’s not rocket science.

We introduced the system step by step. First, we built our folder structure, and then we gradually brought individual departments into the system.

We deliberately didn’t try to change everything at once. Instead, we digitized contracts piece by piece. That made sense, especially because some contracts had previously existed only on paper.

We were able to move from department to department relatively quickly.

In the end, employees were mainly happy that there was finally a clear structure.”

Which retail companies benefit from contract management software?

Which companies in the retail sector would you recommend Inhubber to?

Nick Schäfer: “Once a company reaches a certain size, I believe a contract management tool becomes essential.

If a small business only has three contracts, it probably doesn’t need dedicated contract management software yet.

But once you’re working with many different contractual partners and have things like termination deadlines to keep track of, the situation changes.

The more diversified the company is — with production, sales, HR, and other areas — the more useful a central tool becomes.

Put simply: the more contracts a company has, the harder it becomes to keep an overview. At that point, you need software that brings structure into the process.”

Would you recommend Inhubber?

Nick Schäfer: “We’re very happy with Inhubber.

Today, we have clear structures and clearly defined responsibilities for the different areas.

At the same time, the tool has continued to evolve over the years. That’s important because, just like any other software, a contract management solution can’t stand still.

We’re very happy with the way Inhubber has developed, and we would definitely recommend it.”

Conclusion: contract management in retail needs structure and clear workflows

The CECEBA case shows why contract management software becomes particularly valuable for retail companies working across multiple departments, sales channels, and contract types.

At CECEBA, the contract portfolio ranges from production, purchasing, and customer agreements to HR contracts, leases, international commercial agent agreements, and sponsorship contracts.

With Inhubber, CECEBA has created one central structure for managing them:

  • Contracts are managed centrally with clearly assigned responsibilities.
  • Termination deadlines are monitored automatically.
  • Employees are proactively notified when action is required.
  • Access rights can be structured by department and responsibility.
  • Sensitive contract information can be made accessible only to authorized users.
  • Existing and scanned contracts can be digitized and searched more efficiently.
  • International commercial agent agreements can be signed digitally.
  • Contract management workflows replace manual processes and reduce administrative effort.
  • New departments can be integrated into the central contract management system step by step.

For retail companies with complex structures, the value of centralized contract management becomes especially clear in areas that previously relied on Excel spreadsheets, separate folders, and manual reminders.

Instead of having to regularly search for deadlines or documents themselves, responsible employees receive the information they need in a structured way and at the right time.

This turns contract management in retail from a purely administrative filing system into a digital process that creates greater transparency, clear responsibilities, and reliable contract workflows.

FAQ

Can’t find the answers to your questions? Contact sales →
How can textile companies manage supplier and procurement contracts?

Textile companies can centrally structure supplier and procurement contracts by supplier, entity, business unit, or contract type. Inhubber connects documents with deadlines, owners, and tasks so procurement and other teams can access relevant contract information faster.

How can textile companies monitor contract deadlines?

Termination, renewal, and other important dates can be stored directly on each contract and linked to automated reminders. Owners are notified in time without having to track critical dates separately in spreadsheets or personal calendars.

How can textile companies manage contracts across multiple legal entities?

Groups operating in textile, retail, or e-commerce can assign contracts to individual legal entities and control access by role or responsibility. Entities remain organizationally separated while authorized users retain a cross-company overview.

How can textile companies automate contract workflows?

Recurring reviews, approvals, and tasks can be organized as contract workflows in Inhubber. Procurement, supplier, and service agreements can move through the responsible teams in a structured process, while pending steps remain transparent and easy to track.

Around
0%
time savings
Manual effort in contract management has been significantly reduced compared with previous processes.
0%
transparency
Contracts, deadlines, business units, and contract types remain clearly structured and accessible.
Meet SAENTIS Family Office

SAENTIS Family Office manages a large and diverse portfolio of contracts, including lease agreements with multiple tenants.

Lease agreements require particularly careful management. End dates, rent increases, index-linked adjustments, and graduated rent clauses all need to be monitored reliably over time.

SAENTIS chose Inhubber to replace time-consuming paper-based processes and gain a single, transparent view of its contracts. For around a year and a half, the team has been using the platform to store, sign, and manage contracts in one central place.

The challenge: manual tracking and paper trails

Before Inhubber, SAENTIS managed its lease agreements largely manually.

Each contract had to be printed in duplicate, sent to the tenant, signed, returned, and then filed in the appropriate folder.

The paperwork itself was only part of the challenge. Contract end dates, graduated rent increases, and index-linked adjustments also had to be tracked manually. As the number of contracts and tenants grew, this created considerable administrative effort and increased the risk of missing an important deadline or adjustment.

SAENTIS needed one system that could bring contracts and all relevant information together while making contract management more transparent and efficient.

The solution: One platform for all contracts

Today, SAENTIS manages its contracts in one central digital workspace.

“Inhubber was the perfect fit for our family office. We now have a complete overview of all our contracts, structured by business unit and contract type. The documents we need are always easy to find, deadlines are tracked automatically, and nothing gets lost anymore.”

For SAENTIS, however, effective contract management is about more than organized storage. It is also about understanding what is contained in the contracts and identifying where attention may be required. Inhubber helps the team identify potential contract risks earlier and maintain a clear overview of important obligations.

E-signatures without the printer

Inhubber has also changed the way SAENTIS signs contracts with tenants.

Once the terms of a lease agreement have been discussed and approved, the document can be sent directly to the tenant through Inhubber for electronic signature.

There is no longer a need to print multiple copies, send paperwork back and forth by mail, or manually archive signed documents.

Once signed, the contract remains digitally available to both the tenant and SAENTIS. This creates a connected digital process from final agreement and signature through to ongoing contract management..

Never miss a deadline, or a rent increase

For SAENTIS, one of the biggest benefits of Inhubber is automated deadline tracking.

Lease agreements involve much more than end dates and renewals. They can include graduated rent increases, index-linked adjustments, and other time-sensitive provisions that are easy to overlook when many contracts are being tracked manually.

With Inhubber, relevant dates and contract information are stored centrally and monitored automatically. This reduces administrative effort and lowers the financial risk associated with missing an adjustment or contractual deadline.

Results: Around 80% Time Savings

After around 18 months of using Inhubber, the results are clear.

SAENTIS reports that the team now saves around 80% of the time previously required for contract management.

“What impressed us most was the 100% transparency, ease of use, and automatic identification of contract risks. Manual effort has dropped significantly — we save around 80% of the time compared with our previous process.”

The time savings are only part of the benefit. Inhubber gives SAENTIS a clear overview of its large portfolio of contracts and tenants, provides faster access to documents, and helps the team maintain tighter control over contractual obligations.

It is this combination of transparency and automation that makes the biggest difference in day-to-day work.

From Client To Fan

After around 18 months, Inhubber has become an established part of daily contract management at SAENTIS Family Office.

What previously required numerous manual steps and separate filing structures is now handled through one connected digital process. “We’ve been really happy with the product over the last year and a half. It makes our work easier and, above all, helps us keep track of a large number of different contracts and tenants. You could say we’ve gone from being a customer to becoming a real fan.”

The conclusion:

With Inhubber, SAENTIS Family Office has transformed contract management from a paper-heavy, labor-intensive process into a centralized digital environment.

Contracts are stored, organized, and signed in one place, while important deadlines and contractual terms are monitored automatically — particularly valuable when managing a large number of lease agreements across multiple tenants.

The result: around 80% time savings, significantly less manual work, and 100% transparency across the contract portfolio.

For SAENTIS, Inhubber is more than a digital archive. It is a practical tool that simplifies everyday contract management, improves transparency, and helps ensure that important deadlines, adjustments, and contract risks are not overlooked while allowing them to boost efficiency of your contract management in real estate.

Everything you need to work more effectively with contracts

Request a demo