Inhubber: Your d.velop Alternative
in Germany
certified
encrypted
Trusted by over 10000 happy users
Best suits your company’s needs
|
d.velop | |
|---|---|---|
| General information | ||
|
Office
|
Germany
|
Germany
|
|
Servers location
|
Germany, EU
|
Germany / EU cloud infrastructure
|
|
Pricing
|
Transparent, cost-efficient plans
|
Tiered pricing; additional platform costs may apply
|
|
Primary focus
|
Contract lifecycle management (CLM)
|
Document management and ECM, with dedicated contract management solutions
|
|
Main purpose
|
Manage, analyze, monitor, and control contracts throughout their lifecycle
|
Store, organize, archive, and manage documents and digital business processes
|
|
Typical users
|
Legal, Procurement, Finance, contract owners
|
IT, administration, records management, document management, plus contract teams
|
|
Implementation focus
|
Focused implementation for contract processes
|
Often part of a broader DMS/ECM or Microsoft 365 environment
|
| Contract management | ||
|
Contract lifecycle management
|
Full lifecycle from creation to renewal or termination
|
Available through d.velop contracts
|
|
Deadline management
|
Integrated and automated
|
Available in d.velop contracts
|
|
Renewal & termination tracking
|
|
Available in d.velop contracts
|
|
Contract dashboard
|
Dedicated contract overview
|
Available depending on product setup and configuration
|
|
Contract-specific risk management
|
|
Not the primary focus of the broader d.velop platform
|
|
Contract migration
|
Contract-specific data extraction and migration
|
Document migration and contract data migration depending on setup
|
| AI & automation | ||
|
AI-powered contract analysis
|
Specialized for contract analysis and data extraction
|
AI functions for documents and contracts
|
|
Contract metadata extraction
|
|
|
|
Clause and risk analysis
|
Contract-specific
|
Available within d.velop contract solutions
|
|
Contract workflows
|
Integrated
|
Available through workflows and d.velop contracts
|
| Electronic signatures | ||
|
E-signature
|
Integrated into the contract process
|
Available through d.velop sign
|
|
Signature within contract workflow
|
|
depending on product configuration |
| Document management | ||
|
Contract document management
|
Core functionality
|
|
|
Enterprise-wide DMS
|
Focused on contract-related documents
|
Strong DMS/ECM functionality
|
|
Digital files and records
|
Contract-centered
|
Broad support across many document types
|
|
Archiving
|
Contract-focused
|
Strong enterprise archiving capabilities
|
| Integrations & platform | ||
|
Microsoft 365
|
Integrations available
|
Strong Microsoft 365 offering, including d.velop contracts for Microsoft 365
|
|
SAP integration
|
Depending on requirements
|
Strong integration capabilities
|
|
Broader ECM landscape
|
Not the core focus
|
|
|
Best suited for
|
Companies looking for a specialized platform to actively manage contracts
|
Companies looking for broader document management, ECM, archiving, and contract management within that landscape
|
Why Inhubber stands out
What our customers say about Inhubber
Automatic deadline monitoring is a real game changer for us. We used to manage deadlines manually in Excel spreadsheets, which was naturally error-prone. Now Inhuber ensures that we are notified in a timely manner about upcoming termination periods. This has already saved us from unnecessary costs.
After evaluating several software solutions, we chose Inhubber – not only because it offers a web-based solution that’s accessible from anywhere, but also because of the flexibility in structuring contracts. We wanted the option of storing our contracts in clearly structured categories and areas that perfectly fit our organization.
Inhubber has fundamentally changed the way we handle our contracts by providing a user-friendly and efficient platform that ensures complete transparency. This change has led to significant time savings, particularly through improved organization and accessibility of data. In the financial sector, it is especially useful as it helps keep track of costs and deadlines, making it an essential tool for our sustainable growth.
Thanks to Inhubber, it is now much easier and faster to rent out apartments, and I can even rent them out across the country without having to be there.
We missed cancellation deadlines several times simply because no one remembered that the contract still existed and should be terminated. This led to unnecessary costs that we wanted to avoid.
The advantages I see with Inhubber are, firstly, usability, meaning it’s easy to use for our team members and business partners. The second major advantage I see with Inhubber is the whole issue of data security, data availability, and more.
Award winning CLM software
How Rebuy GmbH improved contract management with Inhubber
FAQ
Inhubber is a specialized contract lifecycle management platform designed to manage, analyze, monitor, and control contracts throughout their entire lifecycle.
d.velop is broader in scope and is primarily known as a document management and ECM platform. It also offers dedicated contract management functionality through d.velop contracts.
Yes. Inhubber is particularly suitable for companies looking for a dedicated contract management solution rather than a broader DMS or ECM environment.
It brings contract data, deadlines, workflows, AI-powered analysis, responsibilities, and digital signatures together in one platform.
d.velop is primarily a document management and ECM platform. For contract management, it offers d.velop contracts as a dedicated solution.
This makes d.velop a broader option for organizations that want to manage many different document types, while Inhubber focuses specifically on contract processes.
Both platforms can support contract deadlines and important dates.
Inhubber is built specifically around contract processes, including deadlines, renewals, termination dates, responsibilities, and automated reminders. With d.velop, these functions are available through its contract management offering and related workflows.
Yes. d.velop provides AI functionality for documents and contracts, including metadata recognition and contract-related analysis.
Inhubber also uses AI specifically for contract analysis, data extraction, and identifying relevant contract information and risks.
Yes. Both solutions support digital signing processes.
Inhubber integrates electronic signatures directly into contract workflows, while d.velop provides signing capabilities through d.velop sign.
For some d.velop contracts offerings, d.velop documents is part of the required platform setup. This can make the overall solution broader than a standalone contract management tool.
Companies should therefore compare not only license prices, but also platform requirements, implementation effort, and additional components.
That depends on the scope of the project.
Inhubber is focused specifically on contract management, which can make implementation more targeted. d.velop can be part of a larger DMS or ECM project involving multiple document types, departments, integrations, and archiving processes.
d.velop offers a dedicated Microsoft 365 contract management solution with integrations for environments such as SharePoint, Outlook, and Teams.
For companies with a deeply embedded Microsoft 365 infrastructure, this can be an advantage. Companies should still compare this with the depth of specialized contract management functionality they need.
d.velop is stronger when the main goal is broader document management, digital files, archiving, and ECM across many document types.
Inhubber is the stronger fit when the main goal is to manage contracts as a dedicated business process.
Yes. Existing contracts can be transferred to Inhubber, including relevant contract information and metadata.
The exact migration approach depends on the number of contracts, existing folder structures, file formats, and available contract data.
The most important factors are contract volume, deadline management, AI functionality, workflows, electronic signatures, integrations, permissions, reporting, implementation effort, and total cost.
The key question is whether the company needs a specialized contract management platform or a broader document management and ECM environment.