Trusted by over 10000 happy users
Keep one record you can rely on
Transfer ownership, with the history attached
Verify ownership at any point in time
Never confuse a copy with the controlled record
Control, integration, and secure workflows around every transfer
Less uncertainty in receivables financing
Award winning CLM software
FAQ
Every contract in Inhubber can be kept together with its ownership, transfer, and activity history. Before a new transaction closes, your team can review whether the contract or associated receivable has already been transferred and who currently controls it. Because the relevant information stays connected in one environment, there’s less need to reconcile PDFs, inboxes, and spreadsheets just to understand what happened. That gives teams a clearer basis for spotting potential duplicate transfers before they become a financing issue.
Yes. Inhubber supports structured ownership transfer within the contract record. When a receivable or an associated contractual right changes hands, the transfer can be documented together with the previous owner, the new owner, a timestamp, and relevant supporting information. The result is a traceable transfer history that stays connected to the contract itself. Instead of documenting the same change across several disconnected systems, teams can keep the process and its history together.
Once a transfer is complete, the new owner or responsible party can be reflected directly in the contract record. Access permissions can also be adjusted to match the new ownership structure, depending on how the organization has set up its process. Previous ownership information and related actions remain part of the history. So the current status can change without losing the context behind it — something that becomes particularly useful when the contract changes hands more than once.
Yes. Inhubber keeps a chronological history of relevant contract activities, including ownership changes and transfer-related actions. Authorized users can look back and understand who controlled the contract at different points in time and when important changes took place. That makes it easier to reconstruct a contract’s lifecycle during an internal review, due diligence process, or audit, without having to piece the story together manually from several different sources.
The controlled contract record and its associated history remain inside Inhubber. Downloading or exporting a document doesn’t replace that central record or the transfer information connected to it. Exported versions can be identified as copies, helping users distinguish them from the record maintained within the system. This becomes especially useful when documents are shared externally, because the broader contract context and transfer history remain connected to the central record in Inhubber.
Inhubber provides a controlled and traceable record of contract status, transfers, timestamps, approvals, and related activity. That can help an organization document and verify how a receivable or contractual right has moved over time. What it does not do is determine whether an assignment is legally effective. That depends on the underlying agreement, applicable law, regulatory requirements, and the structure of the transaction. Inhubber supports documentation and auditability, rather than replacing the legal requirements governing the transfer itself.
Yes. Approval steps can be added before an ownership transfer is finalized. Depending on the organization, that might mean review by legal, finance, risk, or another responsible team. It gives sensitive transactions an extra control point before the contract record or related permissions are updated. More importantly, it helps teams follow the same defined process each time, rather than relying on an email thread or someone remembering to ask for approval at the right moment.
Yes. Inhubber can connect with banking, factoring, ERP, and other internal systems through APIs. This allows contract information, ownership status, and transfer data to be used within existing financial workflows rather than managed as a completely separate process. For example, contract verification can be connected with an internal approval or financing workflow. The exact setup depends on the systems involved, but the goal is simple: less duplicate data entry and fewer disconnected steps.
Yes. Access permissions can be adjusted as part of the transfer process to reflect the new roles and ownership structure. The new owner can receive the access they need, while permissions for previous participants can be reduced or removed according to the organization’s rules. Role-based controls also make it possible to give different levels of visibility to internal and external stakeholders, so access can follow the actual responsibilities around the contract instead of remaining unchanged after every transaction.
Inhubber is designed for organizations that need strong traceability, controlled access, and clear records of contract-related activity. Role-based permissions, activity histories, timestamps, structured workflows, and centralized contract records can support internal controls, audits, and compliance processes. When someone needs to understand how a receivable was handled over time, the relevant information is easier to trace. The exact regulatory requirements still depend on the institution, jurisdiction, and use case, so Inhubber should always be assessed against the organization’s own compliance framework.